Jump to Navigation

Nicholson v. Securitas Security Services, Inc., No. 15-10582 (5th Cir. July 18, 2016)

Here's another case involving a joint-employer relationship between a staffing agency and one of its clients. The Fifth Circuit reverses summary judgment, holding that There was a genuine dispute about whether the staffing agency should have known that the client asked it to reassign an employee for age-biased reasons.

Nicholson v. Securitas Security Services, Inc., No. 15-10582 (5th Cir. July 18, 2016): Ms. Nicholson contended that she was taken off an assignment - at a company called Fidelity - and later terminated because of age -

"There is evidence that Nicholson was 'well-liked' at Fidelity. Even so, in March 2012, Fidelity asked Securitas to remove her. Fidelity told Securitas that Nicholson was unable to perform new technology-related tasks. Securitas removed Nicholson from Fidelity on July 20, 2012. At the time, Nicholson was 83 years old. Nicholson's replacement was age 29. Securitas then terminated Nicholson ten days later after determining There were no other positions Nicholson could fill."

While the plaintiff sued both Fidelity and Securitas, the former settled, leaving the latter to defend the claim. The district court granted summary judgment, holding that Ms. Nicholson failed to prove Securitas was her employer and, in the alternative, Ms. Nicholson could not meet her ultimate burden to show Securitas would not have terminated her but-for her age.

The Fifth Circuit reverses in part. Initially, it holds that the district court erred in holding that Securitas was not an employer. Indeed, "Securitas twice admitted that it employed Nicholson, first in the contract it signed with Nicholson, and second in its answer to Nicholson's complaint where it averred that Nicholson was its employee."

Second, it holds that There was sufficient evidence for a jury to decide whether Securitas acted on an age-biased motive by honoring Fidelity's request to reassign Ms. Nicholson. The panel notes that a joint-employer may be held liable for employment discrimination "participates in the discrimination, "or "knows or should have known of the client's discrimination but fails to take corrective measures within its control." It clarifies that "participation" means that a staffing firm "know[] or should have known the client's reasons were discriminatory."

The panel says that a jury could infer constructive ("should have known") knowledge from the following facts: (1) "Securitas admits that it failed to investigate the circumstances of Fidelity's reassignment request, including not even asking Nicholson for an explanation before removing her from Fidelity." (2) Securitas may have "deviated from standard company practices by not investigating the reasons Fidelity wanted Nicholson removed." (3) Securitas ignored its own guideline stating that "[i]nefficient or substandard performance" is an action that "normally do[es] not result in immediate termination" and instead is "addressed . . . through counseling."

The panel affirms summary judgment on the plaintiff's termination claim, because it was uncontested that There were no other positions Ms. Nicholson was qualified to fill.

subscribe to this blog's feed subscribe to this blog's feed

tell us about your case

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

facebook twitter linked in

our office locations

Outten & Golden LLP
685 Third Avenue, 25th Floor  
New York, NY 10017  
Phone: 212-245-1000
Map and Directions

Outten & Golden LLP
161 North Clark Street
Suite 1600
Chicago, Il 60601  
Phone: 312-809-7010
Map and Directions

Outten & Golden LLP
One California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415-638-8800
Map and Directions

Outten & Golden LLP
601 Massachussetts Avenue NW
Second Floor West Suite 200W
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-847-4400
Map and Directions