Nasser v. AT&T Corp., No. 07-15845 (9th Cir. Jan. 12, 2009)

| Jan 12, 2009 | Daily Developments in EEO Law |

By coincidence, for the second time in a week, a court of appeals files an unpublished opinion in a single-incident harassment case.  The Ninth Circuit panel splits 2-1 on whether a “distasteful” skit lampooning the plaintiff created a hostile work environment.

Nasser v. AT&T Corp., No. 07-15845 (9th Cir. Jan. 12, 2009):  Not much to summarize here, as the majority decision is scarcely a page long.  The panel rejects a claim of sex harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(j)(1), affirming summary judgment.  The panel majority observes that “Nasser points to a single incident-a skit performed at a meeting with a large audience, in which Nasser was portrayed-to support her claim. Though we agree that the skit was distasteful, we cannot say after considering the totality of the circumstances that it was sufficiently severe so as to create an abusive working environment.”

Judge Thomas dissents, noting that “the harasser explicitly linked the employee’s work status with her physical attributes behavior and delivered the offending comment before a group of the target’s co-workers, some of whom were her subordinates” (citing Howley v. Town of Stratford, 217 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 2000)).

tell us about your case


our office locations

Outten & Golden LLP
685 Third Avenue, 25th Floor  
New York, NY 10017  
Phone: 212-245-1000
Map and Directions

Outten & Golden LLP
One California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Map and Directions

Outten & Golden LLP
601 Massachussetts Avenue NW
Second Floor West Suite 200W
Washington, DC 20001
Map and Directions